I would like to share with you on my thoughts on stock valuations.
GuruFocus (GF) Value: a Better Valuation Measure vs. PE
By Charlie Tian
Notable points
- PE (Price-to-Earnings) ratio is widely used but can be misleading for cyclical industries and not considering the growth aspects of the businesses
- GF Value framework takes into account of earnings growth and volatility to better measure stock valuation
- An example of Microsoft of PE (~36) yet considered fair value after taking into earnings growth and business predictability
The Limitations of the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio
The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is one of the most commonly used tools for valuing stocks. It’s simple to calculate, easy to compare across companies, and widely available. Yet, its popularity often hides several key flaws that can mislead investors - particularly in today’s fast-changing markets.
1. Misleads in Cyclical Industries
For companies tied to commodity or economic cycles, the P/E ratio can invert logic. These firms often appear cheap when earnings are at their peak and expensive when profits are depressed - exactly the opposite of what investors should infer.
2. Earnings Are Often Volatile
A single year’s earnings can be distorted by one-off items such as asset write-downs, tax adjustments, or extraordinary gains—making the P/E ratio fluctuate dramatically. Relying on that snapshot can give a false impression of a company’s true performance.
3. Overlooks Growth Potential
The P/E ratio doesn’t account for future growth. As Peter Lynch famously noted, “Because of compounding, a 20 percent grower with a P/E of 20x is a better investment than a 10 percent grower selling at a P/E of 10x.” In other words, higher multiples can be justified by stronger, sustained growth.
Because of these limitations, relying on P/E alone can lead to value traps or cause investors to overlook genuine opportunities.
Key Strengths of the GuruFocus(GF) Value Chart: An Example
GuruFocus developed the proprietary GF Value framework to offer a more complete picture of a company’s valuation. Rather than relying on a single metric, it integrates multiple key factors. It identifies key fundamentals, not just earnings level, that better reflects the stock price.
By integrating these factors, the GF Value model produces a fair value line and valuation bands that show a stock’s current valuation - ranging from significantly undervalued to fairly valued, to significantly overvalued.
Example: Microsoft
At first glance, Microsoft often trades at a high P/E ratio of 36 and looks overpriced. But the GF Value chart tells a clearer story.

Date: 11/10/2025. Source: GuruFocus.com
The GF Value framework considers several key factors:
-
Microsoft’s consistent revenue and earnings growth
-
Its stable profitability and limited sensitivity to economic cycles
-
The historical relationship between its stock performance and business fundamentals
Taking these factors into account, Microsoft appears to be fairly valued under the GF Value model.Rather than focusing on just one year, GF Value aligns valuation with consistent fundamentals, quality, and long-term growth.
Conclusion
The P/E ratio serves as a useful starting point for valuation, but by itself, it fails to capture key drivers such as growth potential, competitive strength, and business consistency. The GuruFocus (GF) Value Chart delivers a more comprehensive, data-driven analysis by blending historical trends with forward-looking fundamentals.
In a market where oversimplified metrics can lead to costly errors, GF Value provides investors with a clearer and more intelligent framework for identifying mispriced stocks—helping them avoid overpaying for average businesses while recognizing opportunities in truly high-quality companies.
About: Charlie Tian, Ph.D. is the founder and Chief Executive Officer and portfolio manager of GuruFocus Investments, LLC, an SEC-registered investment management firm.
Read More Blogs:
- 3 Undervalued Wide-Moat Stocks You May Be Overlooking
- Berkshire's Biggest New Bet: Alphabet (Google)
- GuruFocus (GF) Value: a Better Valuation Measure vs. PE
This research report has been prepared by GuruFocus Investments, LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Registration as an investment adviser with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training.
The information contained in this report is provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security or to participate in any investment strategy. Any opinions or views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice.
GuruFocus Investments, LLC does not accept liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions or inactions taken on the basis of the information provided. The content of this email is not investment advice and any opinions or assertion contained in this email do not represent the opinions or beliefs of GuruFocus Investments, LLC or any of its respective employees.
The information presented is believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.
This communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Unauthorized use, distribution, or copying of this communication or its contents is prohibited.